On 12/8/2011 5:21 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > The recently pushed series of patches included the controversial > introduction of an additional 3 forks per invocation, which might > add a minute or two of wall-clock time to giant builds on windows. > By assuming that windows will run shell scripts on some shell with > all the modern optional features that libtool wants, this patch > eliminates even those 3 new forks. > > Okay to push?
Has anybody done a comparison between: cygwin + libtool + dash/posh (e.g. small, fast shell -- without XSI) cygwin + libtool + bash (e.g. big bloated slow shell -- with XSI) to see which is better? -- Chuck
