Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > It's a bit tricky to reproduce: You > need a system which has no argz.h, then configure, then `make check' > without prior make. If you had ever run `make' before in this build > tree, even after `make clean' the dependency information is stored in > libltdl/.deps/*.Plo, and thus hides this bug. > > Now the gnulib snippet in libltdl/Makefile.am leaves us with the > possibility of using the lib_OBJECTS variable to fix this(?). > > Several questions (thus the crosspost to all of these lists): > - Is it ok/supposed by gnulib to use lib_OBJECTS for this? > - Is it ok by Automake to use the *_OBJECTS variables it created, > i.e., may they be treates as exported interface?
The modules in gnulib are normally used in a directory that creates a single library, say libfoo.la, and in this case a line like all-local $(lib_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) is meant to be changed to all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) If, in the case of libltdl, the directory creates several libraries, then yes your patch looks OK: > +## Make sure argz.h will be created before it is needed: > +lib_OBJECTS = \ > + $(dlopen_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(dld_link_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(dyld_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(load_add_on_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(loadlibrary_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(shl_load_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(libltdl_la_OBJECTS) \ > + $(libltdlc_la_OBJECTS) > + Bruno _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
