On 9/21/2010 9:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > I don't recall having done so in a while but, according to bootstrap: > > # It is okay for the bootstrap process to require unreleased autoconf > # or automake, as long as any released libtool will work with at least > # the newest stable versions of each. Generally, newer versions offer > # better features, and configure.ac documents oldest version of each > # required for bootstrap (AC_PREREQ, and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE). > > And in the release template in HACKING: > > You will then need to have recent (possibly as yet unreleased) versions > of Automake and Autoconf installed to bootstrap the checked out > sources yourself. > > So, I will install git automake at the front of my PATH, and if the > release process works, then I'll go ahead and use it for the release.
OK. If it's documented, then that's fine. > Is there a better way to save rebootstrappers from accidental > downgrade than specifying AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.11a]) in libtool's > configure.ac? Pity Automake doesn't use gnulibs `git-version-gen' so > that I could specify the particular revision with the compile script > patch that we want at libtool bootstrap time. Well, now that I think about it, it doesn't REALLY matter (to me). The only case, at this time, in which you need the compile script IN libtool to be latest-n-greatest is if you are building libtool itself using cl.exe/MSVC. I'm not. So...it doesn't matter if I "downgrade" the compile script by rebootstrapping with released automake. -- Chuck _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
