license-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2017/11/10 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Henrik Ingo
• 2017/11/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Shahar Or
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/11/07 Re: [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 David Woolley
• 2017/11/07 [License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0 Shahar Or
• 2017/11/01 Re: [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/11/01 Re: [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL Diane Peters
• 2017/10/25 Re: [License-discuss] resolving ambiguities in OSD (was [License-review]) Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/10/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] resolving ambiguities in OSD [was Re: For Approval: License Zero Reciprocal Public License] Rick Moen
• 2017/10/25 Re: [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL John Cowan
• 2017/10/25 Re: [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL Diane Peters
• 2017/10/25 Re: [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL Lindsay Patten
• 2017/10/25 Re: [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL John Cowan
• 2017/10/25 [License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL Lindsay Patten
• 2017/10/23 Re: [License-discuss] Guidance for making license information available to users John Sullivan
• 2017/10/23 Re: [License-discuss] Guidance for making license information available to users Philippe Ombredanne
• 2017/10/23 [License-discuss] Guidance for making license information available to users Jesper Lund Stocholm
• 2017/09/27 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/09/05 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/05 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) John Cowan
• 2017/09/05 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/05 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] (no subject) Ben Hilburn
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government John Cowan
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] (no subject) Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] (no subject) Tom Bereknyei
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/09/01 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/31 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/08/31 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/31 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Marc Jones
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Stephen Michael Kellat
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Chris Travers
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/29 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government John Cowan
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Stephen Michael Kellat
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Richard Fontana
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/28 Re: [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/08/28 [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/11 [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0? Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/08/11 Re: [License-discuss] Is Sun Identity Manager (Oracle Waveset) Open Source compliant ? David Woolley
• 2017/08/11 [License-discuss] Is Sun Identity Manager (Oracle Waveset) Open Source compliant ? Ilona A.M. Fleck
• 2017/07/29 Re: [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? John Cowan
• 2017/07/29 Re: [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/07/29 Re: [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? David Woolley
• 2017/07/29 Re: [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? Johnny A. Solbu
• 2017/07/29 Re: [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? David Woolley
• 2017/07/29 Re: [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? Henrik Ingo
• 2017/07/29 [License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license? Johnny A. Solbu
• 2017/07/27 [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0? Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/07/14 [License-discuss] Some formerly-approved licenses not listed under opensource.org/licenses/ (was: SPDX License List v1.14 & OSI questions) W. Trevor King
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Rick Moen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license John Cowan
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Rick Moen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Rick Moen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Simon Phipps
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Rick Moen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Rick Moen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Johnny A. Solbu
• 2017/06/21 [License-discuss] Moderator Advice Simon Phipps
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Joe Kiniry
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license John Cowan
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license John Cowan
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license John Cowan
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license John Cowan
• 2017/06/21 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Henrik Ingo
• 2017/06/18 Re: [License-discuss] GPLv1? Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/06/18 Re: [License-discuss] GPLv1? David Woolley
• 2017/06/18 Re: [License-discuss] GPLv1? John Cowan
• 2017/06/18 [License-discuss] GPLv1? Thorsten Glaser
• 2017/06/14 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Joe Kiniry
• 2017/06/14 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/06/14 Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] EU Commission Publication of EUPL v1.2 Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
• 2017/05/22 [License-discuss] EU Commission Publication of EUPL v1.2 Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
• 2017/05/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patents & interoperability Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/04/17 Re: [License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer Jonas Baggett
• 2017/04/16 Re: [License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer Jonas Baggett
• 2017/04/09 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Philippe Ombredanne
• 2017/04/09 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Luis Villa
• 2017/04/09 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Philippe Ombredanne
• 2017/04/09 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Philippe Ombredanne
• 2017/04/07 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Smith, McCoy
• 2017/04/07 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses John Cowan
• 2017/04/07 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/04/07 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Smith, McCoy
• 2017/04/06 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Philippe Ombredanne
• 2017/04/06 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/04/06 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Richard Fontana
• 2017/04/06 Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses Luis Villa
• 2017/03/28 [License-discuss] OpenSSL License Change Michael Dexter
• 2017/03/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/28 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 John Cowan
• 2017/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Richard Fontana
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Richard Fontana
• 2017/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 John Cowan
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Tom Callaway
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Marc Jones
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Tom Callaway
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/10 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Gervase Markham
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Jim Wright
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Luis Villa
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Luis Villa
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/08 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Stephen Kellat
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] code.mil update Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Ben Tilly
• 2017/03/07 [License-discuss] code.mil update Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Ben Tilly
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Tzeng, Nigel H.
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Ben Tilly
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Richard Fontana
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD David Woolley
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/07 Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Gervase Markham
• 2017/03/06 [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/06 Re: [License-discuss] Protecting database integrity Kevin Fleming
• 2017/03/05 Re: [License-discuss] Protecting database integrity Grahame Grieve
• 2017/03/05 Re: [License-discuss] Protecting database integrity John Cowan
• 2017/03/05 Re: [License-discuss] Protecting database integrity Terrence Bull
• 2017/03/05 Re: [License-discuss] Protecting database integrity John Cowan
• 2017/03/05 [License-discuss] Protecting database integrity Terrence Bull
• 2017/03/03 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/02 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Jim Wright
• 2017/03/02 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Jim Wright
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Diane Peters
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] [somewhat OT provocation] justifying the commercial no-discrimination clause Rick Moen
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Lawrence Rosen
• 2017/03/01 [License-discuss] [somewhat OT provocation] justifying the commercial no-discrimination clause Luis Villa
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Jim Wright
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Jim Wright
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Christopher Sean Morrison
• 2017/03/01 Re: [License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1 Rick Moen

• Earlier messages