It might help if you highlighted the changes (using color text or bold facing). Is your explanation as to why you have declined to adopt the CUA Office Public License limited to the desire to "comply" with regulations in three jurisdictions? Would you be more specific?
Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "DJ Anubis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:02 PM Subject: LAB Public License proposal : Hello, : : Intending to use the following license for LAB Project, I need your advice and : discussion about. : It is an adapted version of http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cuaoffice.php : modified to comply with both USA, French and EEC regulations. Only some minor : formulations and definitions changes and a specific Frenc regulations : paragrah were added to comply with 3 regulations. : : Pre publication is at : http://labsupport.free.fr/liclab.html temporary : address before publishing on official project.site. : : As the text is rather long, I prefer to submit it as link instead of full text : inclusion. : : Thanks for your advice : : JCR : aka DJ Anubis : -- : license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3 -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
