BIRGUL KARAMIZRAK scripsit: > Distribution > > Distribution of the original or the copy of the source code by natural or > legal persons that accept this license is subject to the approval of the > copyright holder. (manufacturer)
This license is not an Open Source license, because it contravenes Clause 1 of the Open Source Definition <http://opensource.org/osd-annotated>: The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale. > Signing of the Contract > > The license will take effect upon signing personally by the license provider > and the licensee. The signature owner is required to be authorized to sign on > behalf of the legal person. In addition, this license contravenes Clause 7 of the Open Source Definition: The rights attached to the program must apply to all to whom the program is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license by those parties. -- We call nothing profound co...@ccil.org that is not wittily expressed. John Cowan --Northrop Frye (improved) _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss