You must be unique :)

On Mar 7, 10:21 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must 
> admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript 
> parts.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> Marius<marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just
> remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig
> deeper.
>
> On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Can it be changed with a deprecation phase?
>
> > -------------------------------------
>
> > Marius<marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4
> > days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try
> > to prioritize.
>
> > On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen <mads...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Marius,
> > > I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects 
> > > under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes
>
> > > Mads
>
> > > On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote:
>
> > > > Dear all,
>
> > > > Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js
> > > > abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several
> > > > redundancies:
>
> > > > 1. JsCmds has ~> method for referencing member of "objects" (i.e
> > > > elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have >> method that "chains" a
> > > > JQueryLeft with JQueryRight
> > > > 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp
> > > > already have the support for building expressions, composing them,
> > > > chaining expressions etc.
>
> > > > My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific
> > > > things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to
> > > > some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary.
>
> > > > If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my
> > > > backlog.
>
> > > > Thoughts?
>
> > > > Br's,
> > > > Marius
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups "Lift" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

Reply via email to