It is not set in the same request as it's being read exactly...
But how is that doable with RequestVars then ?
On Mar 9, 11:55 am, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can use StatefulSnippets if you like, but what you want to do is
> perfectly doable with RequestVars.
> Clearly it's not being set in the same request as it's being read.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> hexa<hex...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we still have a miss understanding
>
> The client_id code clientBox map (_.id.toLong) work ok .. no problems
> with that
>
> What doesnt work would be doing something like :
>
> val clientBox = ViewClient.currentClient
>
> def processEntry () {
> inInvoice.client (clientBox.open_!)
> inInvoice.save
> S.notice ("Entre : Description " + inInvoice.description + "
> Montant : " + inInvoice.amount)
> }
>
> Since in this case inInvoice.client (clientBox.open_!) return an empty
> box since the RequestVar has been destroyed ...
>
> So I was trying to do this but I need to copy or ref the RequestVar so
> that I use it in the next request...
>
> At first I tought because of the closure it would ref it... but it
> seems not..
>
> It's looking more and more like a statefull snippet is the way to
> go...
> On Mar 9, 11:10 am, Lukasz Kuczera <kuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ok i think I see the "bug". It is the magic which i don't understand
> > yet that if you change your client_id from val to var it will be auto
> > promoted into Heap and live out Snippet. Try this out.
>
> > Change:
> > val client_id = clientBox map (_.id.toLong)
> > To:
> > var client_id = clientBox map (_.id.toLong)
>
> > On Mar 9, 3:34 pm, hexa <hex...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi, thanks for the suggestions I like that match {} code.. will try
> > > that..
>
> > > But what you suggest but the post_id is similar to what I'm doing
> > > now.. since this id is a long it will be copied by value
> > > and I can pass it to multiple requests using a closure...
>
> > > I'll try to clarify a bit :
>
> > > A have a ViewClient snippet and an AddInvoice snippet
>
> > > In the ViewClient I add the action AddInvoice which must be bound to
> > > a client..
>
> > > Now passing the client to the AddInvoice form is ok .. I can send the
> > > whole client object to the form snippet using a RequestVar..
> > > which I find kinda neet not having to go trough thoses ids... (maybe
> > > i'm wrong thinking that)
>
> > > But the trick is now that i'm in the AddInvoice snipped and that I
> > > have my RequestVar...
>
> > > I would like to form a closure on it.. an keep it for the post request
> > > so that it gets to ProcesssEntry and I do just :
>
> > > inInvoice.client (client)
> > > inInvoice.save
>
> > > As so no ids are involved...
>
> > > I would need to make a new RequestVar for the post submit with a copy
> > > of the input RequestVar I got in the AddInvoice from the ViewClient
> > > snippet
>
> > > But a SessionVar is out it's way overkill and a statefull snippet....
> > > might be an idea ... would the RequestVar persist in the statefull
> > > snippet?
>
> > > Also I'm having trouble understanding how that scoping is done for the
> > > RequestVar if anyone could shed some light on it... like why a closure
> > > won't "ref" it... (I'm new to scala)
>
> > > Thanks
>
> > > hexa
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
