On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Graham Percival wrote:
The ancient notation template seems to be using a percussion staff. I can't
see anything obviously wrong in the template; could somebody familiar
with ancient notation look at it?
Indeed, the result looks quite broken. AFAICS, the template looks ok.
The only thing I can see that may rise a problem is that within the
StaffGroup, there is no explicit "\new Staff", i.e. some default type of
staff is automatically created. I would have expected that the ordinary
staff is the default, but maybe this has changed for 2.5.27? If this is
the case, then I think this behaviour should be fixed (or, if this
behaviour is really intended, it should be documented).
Greetings,
Juergen
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
Ancient-notation-templates.html
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
