Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
What is it that bothers you tracking an additional repo?
To be up-to-date, I need to do a "git pull origin"
You should only need
git pull -r
please *do* use -r, otherwise our repo is full of silly "Merged brange
foo from .."
*sigh*
Ah, is this why a "git status" report tells me I'm like 78 commits
ahead of master? I just tried git pull -r and it worked well
although something in "Documentation/po/es.po" caused a merge
conflict.
Perfect example: Jonathan. He's currently the main "small doc
fix" guy, but he doesn't have newweb/ and never has, so any fixes
to the website waits for other people to do.
Okay, I see. Well, we agree that the current setup is really
bad. I suppose Jonathan could be taught how to handle a separate
lilypond-web repo?
I wasn't really paying much attention to this thread but then I
saw my name. :) If you need small fixes to the web stuff I could
probably handle that. I actually had the web code at one point
but then I reinstalled my OS and haven't pulled it again. Hard
drive space is not at a premium so I don't mind pulling more code
if it would help the cause. I don't have great html skills but I
know enough to go in and fix typos, broken links, and the like.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
