Doesn't this mix up meaning and appearance? What will you do when
people come asking for LargeStaff, TinyStaff, LittleGreenStaff (for
Martian music), and so forth?
I'm not saying it isn't useful, but maybe it should be named according
to the purpose it serves rather than how it looks.
QuoteStaff?
ReferenceStaff?
AuxiliaryStaff?
Regards,
--
Dan
On 8 Aug 2009, at 15:44, Jay Anderson wrote:
Jay, Mark, anyone: are you interested in submitting a full patch,
with
appropriate documentation, NEWS item etc? If so, we can officially
submit it for inclusion.
Attached is a patch which adds "SmallStaff" to engraver-init.ly.
Everywhere that \accepts "Staff" was used I just added \accepts
"SmallStaff". Let me know if this looks good.
I've never tried to change the documentation so I'm not quite sure
where to start with that. Should there just be an entry in the 'news'
section? Should there be other content? Once I've tested my changes to
the docs I'll add that to the patch.
-----Jay
<small_staff.patch>_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
