2009/10/12 Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks for testing. Do you have an example to show the problem? It was
> certainly my intention to have Dynamics work with alignment-distances.
Sure, try this:
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
a4 b c d
}
lower = \relative c {
\clef bass
a2 c
}
dynamics = {
s2\fff\> s4 s\!\pp
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff = "PianoStaff_pf" <<
\new Staff = "Staff_pfUpper" \upper
\new Dynamics = "Dynamics_pf" \dynamics
\new Staff = "Staff_pfLower" \lower
>>
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn #'line-break-system-details =
#'((alignment-distances . (20)))
}
}
}
> I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. Are you suggesting that a
> staff-affinity = #CENTER line uses non-affinity-spacing instead of
> inter-staff-spacing for both of the staves around it?
Yes, since I thought setting padding would add the same amount of
space above and below the dynamics line.
> I don't see why
> that would make things more automated; both non-affinity-spacing and
> inter-staff-spacing give the same information and use the same
> mechanism, they just apply in different situations. But it would be easy
> enough to change...
No, you're right; having tested it on real music (rather than just the
template, where it works for any size of #'non-affinity-spacing
#'padding), it's no good. :)
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
