Re: Issue #768 - chord repetition shortcut: patch for review

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi David,

Why couldn't you write
<c e g>4 s4*3
or similar?

I might be able to... but with your suggested "fix" of the * symbol,

  R1*8

would end up as

  R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1

and potentially not compress. This unwanted behaviour along with the  
loss of (e.g.)

  <c e g>4 q8-. q8-> ~ q2

would be unfortunate.

Cheers,
Kieren.


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel