> If you would like to change the priority between postponed, low, and
> medium issues -- either raising the priority of a postponed or low
> one, or lowering the priority of a low or medium one -- go ahead.
I'll eventually do that for my own bugs. However, it's basically the
job of the bugmeister to handle this gracefully while adding the bug
into the database.
> The release list for 2.14 already contains an item to check existing
> bugs to see if they've been fixed without updating the database;
> perhaps I could ask the bug meisters to also re-evaluate the issue's
> priorities.
Yeah.
> I don't think we need an "annoying" tag; better classification
> between postponed/low/medium should be sufficient.
Regarding the classification I disagree -- I still think it's too
coarse --, but indeed there are more important things to do than to
adjust the categories separately.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
