Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 12/30/09 7:42 AM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 12/30/09 6:06 AM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
@Carl:
I am not at all familiar with SVG. Could you please produce a file
similar to the one you sent already with different rotating angles?
I can only produce a file like that with the clefs you have designed if you
generate svg output instead of (or in addition to) the pdf output.
Use
lilypond -fsvg myfile.ly
in order to generate svg output (see Command line options for lilypond in
section 1.2 of Usage).
Oh, sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I meant you to create this file
with the original liypond clef. Then we can find the ideal rotating angle,
and I'll implement that in metafont.
OK, I've attached a 300 dpi png and with the clef rotated from 0 to 4
degrees.
Thanks for your work, Carl.
An Inkscape svg is available at
http://www.et.byu.edu/~sorensen/cleftest.svg
OT: This is strange; in the browser, it looks ok, but with inkscape, the
staff lines are missing.
But that's not important, because:
A 600-dpi png is available at
http://www.et.byu.edu/~sorensen/cleftest.png
I printed this and stared at the clefs for quite a long time. I am not
sure to use the
1.5 version as it is, or the 2.0 version with a tiny shift of the bulb
to the right.
But I tend to claim 1.5 being the best.
I'll dive into the metafont sources to rotate the clef.
Marc
In reviewing these, I think a rotation of the whole clef by 1.5 degrees
would look just about perfect.
HTH,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
