On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:46 PM, James Bailey <derhindem...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On 23.02.2010, at 02:18, Graham Percival wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote: >>> >>> As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with lilypond on >>> 10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the issue was just >>> raised on the -user list. Would it be useful now to simply have the >>> PPC/Intel binaries (labeled as such)? >> >> I don't understand. This page looks pretty clear to me: >> http://lilypond.org/~graham/website/macos-x.html >> >> Shows x86 / PPC. The text says Intel / G3 and G4. What's the >> issue? > > The issue being that a very intelligent user might go to > http://lilypond.org/install/ instead. Which still has the 10.5 (Leopard), > 10.4 (Intel) and 10.3 and newer links.
Patches accepted. :-) From you or anyone else interested. The code for the current website is here: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/web;hb=web I would rather spend my LilyPond time on other issues, or else I would fix it myself. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
