Sorry for being silent for some time, i got distracted by other things... 2011/7/7 Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk>: > On 07/07/11 08:59, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> 2011/7/7 Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk>: >>> On 06/07/11 20:31, lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >>> And it's the one supplied with lilypond - I assumed it formatted the >>> code as per lilypond guidelines ... >> >> It isn't, mostly because there were no precisely defined guidelines >> for a long time - sorry for that... >> We've just discussed it and we're implementing a solution, so soon >> this won't be a problem anymore. >> If you have a patch that wasn't processed by fixcc, send it to me, but >> if you don't, i'll take care of this. >> > Oops. I should have known better - I follow the kernel a little and they > moan there that format changes should always be in their own patch... > > No. I don't have a patch without the format changes, sorry :-( But it's > a mistake I doubt I'll make again!
:) As for this patch, i'll handle adapting it to fit our style guidelines (if necessary). > Out of curiosity, what fix are you proposing? Something with git-hooks? I haven't followed the discussion about technical details, but IIRC you can find it by searching for mails with topic "GOP-PROP 3 - C++ formatting" and "Adapt fixcc.py to use Astyle". cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
