I like some of the changes here, but I have serious doubts about others.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1353 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1353: \time 6/8 huh?! why is this easier to understand than \partial 4 ? http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1355 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1355: e8 | a4 c8 b[ c b] | what on earth does manual beaming have to do with a \partial? How does that improve this example? http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1366 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1366: The @code{\partial @var{duration}} can also be written as; if this was true, then surely there would be no difference between \partial and \set blah after the piece had begun. However, the @knownissues claims that you should only use \partial in the beginning. I think in this case the original material was slightly less misleading. http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
