Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 07:00:27PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> writes: >> >> > However, even for HTML we need some kind of line width so that we can >> > line-break all lilypond snippets. >> >> That line width should be based on a pixel width (1024 is probably >> reasonably). It is nonsensical to have it based on a paper size. > > We want the line widths to look the same in the HTML as in the > pdfs.
Why? > Also, we don't want to insist that people use a full-screen window > with at least 1024 pixels -- or rather, given the left-hand navbar, > that would require at least a full-screen window at 1280 pixels or so. So make a different HTML-related decision. >> If lilypond-book calls texi2pdf in the course of generating HTML, >> that is a bug. > > No, that is correct and working as desired. Why would that be desirable? Why should the HTML documentation be made to look different on a system with a different paper width setting for PDF? That does not make sense. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
