Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using >>>> it in code and documentation rather than s1*0? >>> >>> What a great idea! No notes generated; the duration doesn't >>> change. >> >> Indeed! I wasn't aware that <> is valid syntax at all. > > +1
<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2517> makes <> work as expected with \displayLilyMusic and transparent for chord repeats q. In contrast to other "new features", it will not be necessary to refrain from using it instead of s1*0 in examples intended for LilyPond 2.14 or older, so I am copying the user list with this "discovery" of an old feature. Mentioning this in the "Changes" section will make sense when simultaneously changing most of the uses of s1*0 in the docs, and I think I am done for the day right now. If someone wants to pick this up, I will not be unhappy. Followups of this side-thread directed to the general user list. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
