On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote: > Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł: > >>How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a > >>sentence ending punctuation.
I missed something; why not keep . for the thick one? as in the current "|." ? > "=" cound be used instead of the current "dashed", too. > > What about either "[" or "]" for the thick bar line? > > "|]" or "|[" compared to "|I" "I|" or "|!" "!|". > > I knew we'd come to this point, but besides: yes, there's many possibilities. And whatever you end up doing, we're going to change them in a few months in GLISS. My recommendation: just pick something you like and run with it. Right now this is in the "sour spot" of bikeshedding. We should either have a formal discussion (which waits until GLISS), or just get something done by you picking arbitrarily. I say that you should pick arbitrarily right now (or in the near future). > Are there any objections/meanings about > > (1) moving most of the code from bar-line.cc and span-bar.cc into > the scheme layer > > and > > (2) is the "single glyph approach" feasible? Changing "." to "I" or > whatever char > is not a big problem, once the routines are settled. Yes, those are much more important things to discuss. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel