On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> >>How about ! then?  It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
> >>sentence ending punctuation.

I missed something; why not keep . for the thick one?  as in the
current "|." ?

> "=" cound be used instead of the current "dashed", too.
> 
> What about either "[" or "]" for the thick bar line?
> 
> "|]" or "|[" compared to "|I" "I|" or "|!" "!|".
> 
> I knew we'd come to this point, but besides:

yes, there's many possibilities.  And whatever you end up doing,
we're going to change them in a few months in GLISS.

My recommendation: just pick something you like and run with it.
Right now this is in the "sour spot" of bikeshedding.  We should
either have a formal discussion (which waits until GLISS), or just
get something done by you picking arbitrarily.

I say that you should pick arbitrarily right now (or in the near
future).

> Are there any objections/meanings about
> 
> (1) moving most of the code from bar-line.cc and span-bar.cc into
> the scheme layer
> 
> and
> 
> (2) is the "single glyph approach" feasible? Changing "." to "I" or
> whatever char
> is not a big problem, once the routines are settled.

Yes, those are much more important things to discuss.

- Graham

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to