On 8 sept. 2012, at 08:46, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > On 2012/09/08 05:28:02, Keith wrote: >> now I measure it 2% /faster/ than master. > > Of course that makes no sense. I got confused of which executable I had > when switching between patches. This patch is still about 6% slower > than master, buy maybe worth it. > > Also, 'accidental-single-double.ly' is broke for me as well with > starting with patch set 2, so nothing mysterious there. > > (It works if I just bypass the test for "restore-first".) > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6489086/
OK - I'll be able to fix all the broken stuff on Monday or Tuesday. ~Mike _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
