Hello, On 5 October 2012 00:19, Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote: > This is a proposal to move the triplet/tuplet discussion forward. > > There will be new commands to supplement (or eventually replace) the > current \times command. > > 1. \tuplet n/m {<music expression>} > % does what \times does, but not so easily confused with \time > % command. > 2. \triplet {<music expression>} % shorthand for current > % \times 2/3 command > 3. \duplet {<music expression} % shorthand for current > % \times 3/2 command > 4. \quadruplet {<music expression} % shorthand for current > % \times 6/4 command > 5. \sextuplet {<music expression} % shorthand for current > % \times 4/6 command
Do we need all these commands? Can't we just have \tupelet and then a qualifier (or whatever it is called) that then determines if it is 3/2. 2/3, 6/4 etc. I may be the only one but no one that I play with makes any distinction from a musical point of view between a 'tupelet' that is 2/3 and one that is, say, 5/3 or 6/4. They are all 'tupelets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuplet Am I missing something Ian (if so, sorry)? James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel