On 10/09/2012 01:12 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Absolutely! Inverting the fraction for \tuplet was the original reason
for inventing it, IIRC.
Woah, really? I thought the whole point was to avoid the
confusion between \time and \times. I think it would be
extremely confusing for "\tuplet x/y" to mean the same thing as
"\times y/x".
Aren't they both good reasons? You get to avoid too-similar command names,
_and_ you get a syntax that matches more closely to the musical notation. Seems
like a win on both counts.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
