On 2012/11/05 22:45:06, thomasmorley65 wrote:
On 2012/11/05 22:40:36, lemzwerg wrote: > Very nice!
Can't review the code. But from description: GREAT
The same in my case... David, could you add a comment (either to the parser code, or in the commit message) that explains why the old code didn't work and how the new code solves the problem? Even if it's obvious for you, I think it would be helpful for anyone reading and writing parser code in the future. best, Janek http://codereview.appspot.com/6812088/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
