We do lose the double-dot on << f'4.. \\ f'2. >>
Yes. As shown in the scanned Beethoven example in #3179, what lilypond currently does with `chord-dots' off is not correct either...
Well, Gould is showing the usual case, where notes have Dots.staff-position = 0. You were asking for opinions on the optimal way to behave for users who override Dots.staff-position. You could generalize by using the requested Dots position 'p' (which is exactly the NoteHead position in the simple case) in place of the note-head position.
Thanks for the suggestion. In case there is ever the need to improve my solution, you give a recipe to do that :-) https://codereview.appspot.com/7319049/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
