On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote: > > (quotes from David) > > The basic idea behind that is not to make confrontations nicer but > reduce the necessity for them by establishing playing fields with > different authorities. So that people can get work done without > endangering the release, and I can get releases done without pissing > people off as a prerequisite.
I agree with this idea, but I feel like I'm missing something. How would regular git branches be insufficient for this? Is it simply the lack of GUB for branches? I mean, is the problem a technical or social one? My gut feeling is that this is a social issue, so any technical wish-lists are a red herring. That said, I admit that I haven't even skimmed the patch countdowns in the past few months, let alone read any arguments on -devel. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
