On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 07:45:15PM +0000, James wrote: > If you are comfortable with making patches and compiling, LilyDev is > probably not for you. If you are not or want a ready-to-go > environment and don't care that it's on some 'old' Linux release > (i.e. not new and shiny) then LilyDev is perfectly fine.
Agreed. Urs: if you didn't get that impression from reading the CG, then could you suggest somewhere to add something to that effect (or maybe just copy James' comment literally) ? We don't actually want to discourage experienced linux users from using their native environment; like you, I would find it a bit insulting if a project really did claim that I wasn't able to set up my own devel environment. That said, we want to make it absolutely clear that sorting out the potentially-complicated build dependencies is not *required* from contributors. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
