On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> Can't judge the code but the idea looks great :-) > > Thanks--I'm noticing that bits of code get reused on the lists, so there's a need. This will help tuck away some of the code gobbledygook that is so off-putting.. It occurs to me that it shouldn't be any trouble to add something like ly:item-location later on. It could return (global-timestep . (measure . measure-position)).. David _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
