On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote:
> Hello, > > while getting to terms with the accidentalStyle code I found that it would > be useful (currently only for dodecaphonic-no-repeat-rule, > scm/music-functions.scm:line 1682f.) to have a ly:moment<=? Scheme > predicate function. It’s easy to do in Scheme: > > (define (ly:moment<=? a b) > (or (equal? a b) > (ly:moment<? a b))) > > but I see that the ly:moment<? procedure is defined in > lily/moment-scheme.cc. > Do you think it’s worth it to generally provide such a procedure? Or just > define it locally in music-functions.scm? > > It has already been provided: see moment<=? in scm/lily-library,scm. David _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
