On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 02:39:09PM +0000, James wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:33:11 +0100 > Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > > > Whatever the reason for this weirdness, I think it would really be > > better if we had a code review tool which didn’t rely on external > > login providers. Is there really no free alternative? > > We had a 'similar' discussion back in 2013 > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-09/msg00351.html
Heh, yes! I'm aware of problems with the existing setup -- in fact, my first few patches were delayed by half a week because I had problems setting it up. Quite apart from the loss of time, that was a huge drain on my energy and motivation. A week ago, I started investigating alternatives. As always, my primary motivation is *not* adding any additional burden to our experienced developers. I have not yet reached the point at which it would be useful to discuss any proposals on -devel, though. (As we can see from the 2013 emails, a very wide-ranging discussion quickly becomes bogged down and fails to produce results. If anybody is very interested in the "alternatives" question and is willing to do 2-5 hours of work that will probably end up being discarded, feel free to contact me off-list.) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
