Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> writes: >> Uh, you set the dimensions to 0,0 _after_ moving the thing to its place. >> That would make the remaining point stick out seriously wide of the >> actual glyph. Maybe move the set_empty before the translate_axis? > > Not even the following code shows any improvement: > > Stencil total; > for (int i = 0; i < hyphens; i++) > { > Stencil ds = dash_stencil; > ds.translate_axis (span_points[LEFT] + start_space + > i * (dash_period + dash_length), X_AXIS); > total.add_stencil (ds); > if (whiteout > 0.0 ) > { > Box wb (Interval (0, dash_length + 2 * whiteout * lt), > Interval (h - whiteout * lt, h + th + whiteout * lt)); > Stencil ws; > ws.set_empty(false); > ws = (Lookup::round_filled_box (wb, 0.8 * lt)); > ws.set_empty(false); > ws = ws.in_color (1.0, 0.0, 0.0); > ws.translate_axis (span_points[LEFT] + start_space + i * > (dash_period > + dash_length) - whiteout * lt, X_AXIS); > ws.set_empty(false); > total.add_stencil (ws); > total.set_empty(false); > } > } > > total.translate_axis (-me->relative_coordinate (common, X_AXIS), X_AXIS); > total.set_empty(false); > return total.smobbed_copy (); > }
Sigh. Why do you use set_empty _after_ translation? That makes the remaining point stick out from the actual glyph. And of course, it totally moots any effect of set_empty before translation. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel