https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043/diff/40001/lily/self-alignment-interface.cc File lily/self-alignment-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043/diff/40001/lily/self-alignment-interface.cc#newcode61 lily/self-alignment-interface.cc:61: return scm_from_double (- ext.linear_combination (scm_to_double (align))); On 2016/12/25 17:25:26, david.nalesnik wrote:
Grobs are recognized by their interfaces not their names. So here you
would
write !has_interface<Lyric_syllable_interface> (me)
(I confess I'm unclear when internal_has_interface is used, though.)
When has_interface does not work because the type cannot be determined at runtime? But this case appears icky. Why would we have a non-empty glyph with empty extents here in the first place? Shouldn't it be removed earlier? https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
