Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2020, 22:33 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble: > On May 13, 2020, at 17:13, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > > At the current point of time, our pipeline does not tend to be > > > > all that > > > > full I think. We are not at Linux kernel levels of > > > > participation... > > > > > > No, you're probably right. It's only a bit more bothersome if you > > > have > > > multiple changes to submit from the same countdown. > > > > The real problem starts when people don't manage to get their patch > > in > > because the pipeline is always busy. But if we are there, the free > > CI > > plan will most certainly not do the trick anymore. > > One thing is clear: we need to make sure we don't abuse James' > generosity, so I'm willing to try whatever system you think will be > the fairest all around, even if it might be a bit "bothersome" as an > individual submitter from time to time. >
That's true. But I'd like to disencourage (can you say that?) using our small contribution frequency as an argument here. Making it easier to contribute and as a consequence have more contribution was a major motivation behind all this. So while we'll surely never get to a Linux kernel situation having a solution that scales to some activity substantially increased from what we have now should be a requirement. Urs > — > Dan > >
