Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 20:30 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > Am Samstag, den 23.05.2020, 16:38 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: > > Am 23. Mai 2020 15:01:11 MESZ schrieb Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > > > I can grant you access to the repository later today if needed. > > > > However I'd first like to understand (probably from Werner) > > > > what > > > > makes a branch in the upstream repository more "preserving" > > > > than a > > > > public clone. Being distributed it really doesn't make much > > > > difference from the git perspective. > > > > > > IMO, code for a LilyPond GSoC project should become an integral > > > part > > > of the master git repository. I think it should be freezed in > > > its > > > final form (this is, right after GSoC ends) for documentation > > > purposes. If the stuff gets merged, the branch should still stay > > > and > > > not be deleted. > > > > > > Note that this is my personal point of view, and I don't insist > > > on it. > > > On the other hand: if you see problems with that approach please > > > elaborate. > > > > I would second that a student who has been accepted to GSoC should > > be considered part of the team and grantwd push access, as long as > > there are regulations preventing them from accidentally pushing to > > master. > > Invited @WolfGangsta to the lilypond group.
While we're at it, I'd be happy to be part of the group too. Urs