Hi Carl-Henrik, > As far as i can see this Brandt & Roemer thing is a work in progress.
Indeed. > I'm thankfull somebody seems to be working on it! You’re welcome. =) > There is however much to be done before chords in Lilypond are mature enough > to use for jazz chord notation. I don’t think anybody argues that point. > I'm crossing my fingers that a lilypond-programmer reads this and takes pity > on us who needs this for our work. One of the reasons I’m developing the B&R stylesheet is that it is the most complete and logical *organization* of chords that I've ever found. (The actual *naming*, on the other hand… well…) Once the file is complete — including all programming (Scheme functions, etc.) necessary to make the B&R stylesheet work as intended — and it passes some vetting/consensus process in the Lilypond community, I’m hoping it will become the template for a rapid proliferation of chord-naming stylesheets, which will naturally include more conventional/accepted naming schemes. Best regards, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
