On 10/27/16 6:18 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Urs Liska" <lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu....@gnu.org on behalf of u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> > >Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup ><d...@gnu.org>: >> >>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >> >> >>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order: >> >>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ... >> >>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to >>bottom, assignments should be more like >> >>1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ... >> >>namely keeping the small voice numbers for the inner voices. Now I am >>sort of afraid that changing this is likely to end pretty disruptive to >>existing scores. Even though I don't know how many really use the >>original ordering unchanged as well as intentionally. >> >>Thoughts? > >I just stumbled over this for the first time recently (because I usually >use the othe construct with explicit voices). I found it disturbing that >I can't define the voices from top to bottom but have to apply a >seemingly wrong ordering. I think that we should do the right thing, and enter voices from top to bottom when using automatic polyphony. I think we should make a big deal about the change, and let users know. I believe there will be a relatively small number of scores that this will affect. But I don't think we should keep doing something wrong just because we started doing it wrong. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
