Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> writes: > I'm not sure if this is a language problem, or an attitude problem. > Because it seems like you are coming to the opposite interpretation of what > I say, despite me being very detailed in my explanation. > > > Let's start with the main point: > > THE VERTICAL ORDER OF NOTES ON THE PAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORDER OF > THE VOICES WITHIN THE << // // // >> CONSTRUCT, OR WHAT THE VOICE NAMES ARE > CALLED > > Do you agree with that? You should, since it is true.
No, I don't agree with it. If you cannot distinguish "high correlation though not 100%" from "no correlation", I don't see a point in continuing. The reason the various shifts and stem directions are assigned in the manner and order they are is because this tends to minimize collisions for the _customary_ note order within voice stacking. It's not arbitrary at all, so "nothing to do with" just is plain wrong. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
