On Mon 23 Oct 2017 at 11:10:23 (+0200), Robin Bannister wrote: > Karlin High wrote: > > >Curiouser and curiouser. The part that bugs me the worst is when I do > >a Reply-All and the message never appears on the list, but then the > >other recipients of my message ALSO do a Reply-All, and have their > >replies to my message get posted to list, making it seem that my > >message delivered everywhere but to the list. Most recent example > >here, in David Nalesnik's automatic partwriter thread: > > > >https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-09/msg00471.html > > > >That makes it hard not to blame something on the GNU Lists end of things. > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00129.html > > The end of this thread shows a Reply-All from me reaching the recipient > but not the list. > > The list archive knows enough about it to say "Message not available".
AIUI that line is merely a placeholder. If a posting has a line like In-Reply-To: <foo> and the list doesn't already have a matching Message-ID: <foo> then it threads the posting to the placeholder rather than threading it to any old message or starting a new thread. So the question is why your Message-ID: <2914e16a-e129-19ca-4fc2-b3a552123...@dabble.ch> didn't arrive on the list. Perhaps the spam scan produced a false positive. Has this started happening within the past year? I notice that your postings are submitted slightly differently from previously. Unfortunately the partial scorings aren't revealed in the headers on this list. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user