Am 03.07.19 um 06:36 schrieb Evan Driscoll:
It's for cello, and just the part, no score.
Is that playable? I sadly haven’t touched my cello for a few months now
and it’s 350 km away so I can’t try but I think I couldn’t play that
passage despite having long fingers …
It's a transcription of the violin part of the violin+piano arrangement
of Danse Macabre. For the violin, it's up an octave and the problem I
have with it doesn't arise -- it's comes out much the same as tenor
clef. Lots of it can't be reasonably written without treble clef, so
being capable in that clef is necessary; the high note I think is a'' /
A5 (the A just above the top of the treble staff)
The violin part has b flat in the lower voice, not g. That makes it
playable on the cello too but brings me to the question how you’ll
arrange the following measure …
> { s4^"The default, but melody 'lost' in the other visual
noise" }
Looks fine IMO.
I also got rid of some elaboration of why I thought this was a problem
in the first place, which is that I find it difficult to see the line of
the top notes there; to me, the inter-note intervals are kind of buried
amidst a ton of stems and staff lines and such. In fact, that actually
held one of just two typos I've found that made it through all my
proofreading and to the point where I started to actually work from the
part. But who knows... maybe I'm the odd one out here and most people
*wouldn't* have any problem with it; maybe I'm too stuck up on the fact
that I made a typo and am trying to overcorrect.
If it’s hard to read because of a “ton of stems and staff lines and
such” maybe there is a layout problem, f. e. too small staff size,
staves not far enough apart. Changing the stem direction shouldn’t be
necessary.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user