Hi Aaron, thank you for looking into it. I think I'll get along with the suggestion in the current score, but I'll also file a bug report because I think this should not happen in the first place, and the notation is not terribly excentrly ...
Best Urs 24. September 2019 19:23, "Aaron Hill" <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> schrieb: > On 2019-09-24 9:35 am, Urs Liska wrote: > >> Is there any reason why the slrus in the attached example come out the >> way they do (i.e. so horizontal, with the left edge being so far away >> from the notehead)? > > Seems to be a combination of slurring identical pitches and the articulation > on the one note. If > you remove the staccato, the slur sits reasonably close. If you change either > pitch, then the slur > behaves more normally. > > %%%% > \version "2.19.83" > > { a'8._( a'16_.) \bar "||" > a'8._( a'16) b'8._( a'16_.) a'8._( b'16_.) } > %%%% > >> What would be the best way to deal with that? Of course I could \shape >> them individually, but there's a lot of them in the scores, so I'd >> prefer a *setting* to be applied. > > Adjusting edge-attraction-factor seems to help, but be careful with too high > a value as it collides > with the articulation: > > %%%% > \version "2.19.83" > > { \once \override Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor = #38 > a'8._( a'16_.) > \once \override Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor = #48 > a'8._( a'16_.) > \once \override Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor = #58 > a'8._( a'16_.) } > %%%% > > -- Aaron Hill > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user