On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: >> If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax is >> "pitch duration other", then I'm all for it. If it's a simple >> "you need to put the ' before the duration", then I'd probably >> reject it as being insufficiently general. > > my first idea was something along the lines of your refusal. :) i do > have some other ideas about how to explain the syntax, but they depend > on where you want to put it in the docs. ... > where would you put it in 3.1.?
Hmm. I was initially thinking of 3.1.2, but that subsection (actually, the entire section) is really talking about *macroscopic* style. I mean, it refers back to the definition of a (compound) "music expression". With that in mind, perhaps 2.3.1 is the best place: add 2-3 sentences and an articulation (or dynamic, or something) to the first paragraph+example. That said, this is really Trevor's area now. Let's see what he says. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
