On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
>> Graham was referring to the fact that nobody seem to bother about looking at >> those automatically-created regression results before or after a release. > > Yes. All it takes is bookmarking the site, checking it whenever > there's a release, and reporting any broken examples. However, > nobody is willing to commit to do this. 15 minutes whenever > there's a release, which happens at most once every two weeks. This is the wrong priority: this is the release manager's task, and in the ideal world, and the RM would continue the release if there are regression errors. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
