David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
@ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by
default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not
from you) was that Lilypond was mainly a notation typesetter... And
while been busy with the lilywrap script, I was thinking, ok maybe
that's right, but what is wrong with having both, e.g. good lay-out and
good midi output?
Of course there's nothing wrong with having both! However, nobody
else wants to work on midi output.
Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The
syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU.
It is dedicated to midi, not notation. Why not find a way to
use their work, at worst by means of a translation script?
Regards, daveA
Could an improved articulate script no be enough? What can Midge add to
Lilypond midi?
\r
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
