Why not simply extend the current example so that it shows all the
possibilities? No need to explain in words, especially since the names
are more or less self-explanatory.
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
Doing this right probably means a careful explanation of a few of these in
the NR, and an appendix showing all of the possibilities.
I was about to suggest something like that, but aren't appendices
automatically generated? How would you implement that?
Cheers,
Valentin
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
