On 3/20/11 2:55 AM, "Francisco Vila" <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/3/18 Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com>:
>> 2011/3/18 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:47AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
>>>> Just adding articulate.ly in ly/ and giving one example in the docs
>>>> is probably not what you expect ...
>>>
>>> Why not? That's certainly how I'd start going about this. I
>>> haven't looked at it, so I might notice some problem with that
>>> approach when I see a patch. Or other people might notice some
>>> problem with the approach. But that's definitely how to begin.
>>
>> The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script.
>
> I've not checked, but is the license compatible with that of lilypond?
> A simple line stating "this file has the same license as the lilypond
> package" would serve.
>
Actually, if it's part of the LilyPond distribution, it should have a
standard LilyPond header.
Peter, are you OK with giving this code to LilyPond?
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
