On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock <neilthorn...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to this list: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list > > it looks like critical issues were found.
Yes, they were. > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website. I'm not happy with this practice, either. On the other hand, when 2.14 was being released a year ago, the news on website were all "release candidate", "release canceled", "release candidate", "release canceled", "release candidate", "release canceled" - it looked weird. I suggest the following: when a critical bug is found, /modify/ second paragraph of the "release candidate" news to this: <crossed out>There are no known Critical issues with this release.</crossed out> A Critical bug was found, this release candidate is canceled. (date) Graham, what do you think? cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user