Jonas Olson <jol...@kth.se> writes: > Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the > following was written by David Kastrup: >> > You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at >> > all unless a minimum is met, meaning that I have to finance the whole >> > month on my own. This is not exactly going to extend the time I will be >> > able to work on LilyPond while tapping into my own non-replenishable >> > reserves. I don't see that it would make sense for me to offer a plan >> > where people pay less in case more is needed. > > Yes, what I described would be an all-or-nothing plan. I'm thinking that > people might be unwilling to dump money on something that might turn out > not to reach any reasonable target anyway. I'll describe it some more in > case I wasn't clear. > > Say, for example, that you are working a different job but would like to > return to developing LilyPond full time.
I don't see the point in hypotheticals. They distract from reality. The reality is described in <URL:http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-24#an_urgent_request_for_funding>, and alternate universes can make their own plans more competently than I would be able to. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
