Eric Pancer <epan...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin >> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond. > > Please, no! > >>From man 1 hier > > [..] > libexec/ system daemons & system utilities (executed by > other programs)
Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but some bin (well, actually out/bin) and, after installation, in some /usr/local/bin (so the companion would be something like /usr/local/libexec/lilypond/2.17.7/i686-pc-linux-gnu/ if we are taking things literally). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user