2013/6/10 Federico Bruni <fedel...@gmail.com>: > Hi Harm > > thanks for reviewing the snippet
Approved as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=879 > 2013/6/9 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> >> >> 2013/6/8 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >> >> > If I have more time I take a look. >> >> Hi Federico, >> >> there's one point not clear to me: >> What does \arrUp mean regarding the strike-direction? >> >> As an example I use a chord (see attached png) >> Striking a chord >> 1.) from the lowest pitch up to the topmost or >> 2.) the opposite? >> >> I remember seeing both in printed editions. >> From your coding I believe you mean 2.), though I'd vote always for 1.) >> Maybe it might be good to clearify it with an amended example. >> > > Yes, I mean 2. > Think it visually, it's not related to pitches but just direction of the > strikes: if flatpick is moving up, e.g. from first to second string, I need > an arrow up. > All the flatpicking scores I have use this notation. [...] > Is it more clear now? Well, in classical Guitar-scores the strike-direction is _always_ related to the pitches. ↑ means from bottom-pitch up to top-pitch. Always. I'm not aware of any exception. In notated Flamenco-guitar-music the same. Only in guitar-music to be played with a pick it's the opposite. This inconsistency is disturbing. Though, not a reason to not approve your snippet. :) Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
